One of the greatest tests of the people post-NESARA will be to avoid anger and revenge ..... Let go the past and see the start of a bright, new future. Let those who did us wrong live with their problem - if they survive: let us get on with better things - there is so much constructive work to do, let us let go of all negative or destructive thoughts. Government will be a major target of public anger. Future governments will not consist of politicians, who have their own agenda (or the agenda of those businesses financing them) but rather scientists, researchers and administrators - professionals in their field, which will bring stability and accountability back to government. Representatives will be chosen for their wisdom, experience and spiritual understanding. Those with ulterior motives will be known, and there will be no place for them in the administrative organizations. TC Douglas, a past premier of Saskatchewan, used the term "Stewardship with Divine Guidance". Here is what he said in October 2008:
Political parties will be a thing of the past. Representatives will represent the people rather than the party. There will be no 'opposition': this is government by the people, for the benefit of all. It will also not be 'assuming power' as the press are wont to call it: this is leadership. Cabinet Ministers and other officials will be appointed on their ability and experience, rather than political clout. Lobbyist may become a defunct occupation. Imagine the savings realised by free elections and such a government. That should also guarantee no more SHOE THROWING .....!
STEWARDSHIP WITH DIVINE GUIDANCE
24th October, 2008
All is well. All is serene. We applaud those on your side who have the intent to serve for it is a powerful intent. With it comes great responsibility and we are here to ensure that all is carried out in a timely and divine fashion. We are for the people of our beloved country of Canada. There are groups here who work with others in different countries. They are prodding those humans who are suitable to interpret the new era's stewardship, for they have a burning desire for change. Change will come in all forms. Those who rule the Earth with greed and corruption will be struck as by lightning. Many have fallen and more will fall. Power of the selfish is failing. Many are running with their tails between their legs. It is a sight for us here. We applaud when another one bites the dust. By that I mean when one falls as he is running. But the best is when one sees the Light and renounces his ways, turning to the Light and recognizing the good that is within themselves. Many marvels are occurring and we are alert at all times as we do not wish to miss a thing. Great change is in the air. It is being given on the wings of the Great Breath who loves all beings and this great planet .The Great Plan is implemented by the Steward above who wishes only the best for his people. I am TC Douglas and I bid you a good day.
The term suggested, "Stewardship with Divine Guidance" is one that we will use from now on. It describes the new era well. Using the term "government" is derogatory and those who hear the word might be turned off by the very sound of it. Many are fed up with what the word has represented for so long. Those looking and ready for something new will receive the term "Stewardship with divine guidance" well.
Journalist throws shoes at President Bush, December 2008 in Baghdad
|Let us take a look at the new style of government. It will be run in the same way that a Board of Directors runs a company today. True, shareholders do have some say, but there will be no shares in the future, therefore no shareholders, so the directors will be the sole guides for the company. One individual can lead, but the concerted efforts of many are required to create change.
President Obama presides over a meeting of the US cabinet,
20th April 2009 at the White House. White House Photo by Pete Souza
The very word 'politician' has a criminal ring to it these days. Few voice their own opinions. It is said that members of the US House of Congress each received two million dollars to support one group in Congress. And British PM Tony Blair is said to have received personally $6 billion to side with President Bush in his war against Iraq. It has always been said that Money Talks ..... The Bush Administration bribed Turkey and other countries to get their support in the U.N. for invading Iraq, and also threatened to withdraw foreign aid and impose other penalties if they didn't. (The $26 billion bribe failed to persuade the Turkish parliament.) The feeling of the people is probably echoed most in these October 2008 quotations from the Ukraine, now that their popular and peaceful "Orange Revolution" of 2005, which warmed hearts throughout the world, has disintegrated on account of unfulfilled promises, failure to remove corruption and inside fighting. (The President had no control over the purse strings!)"I grew so rich that I was sent
By a pocket borough into Parliament.
I always voted at my party's call,
And I never thought of thinking for myself at all.
I thought so little, they rewarded me
By making me the Ruler of the Queen's Navee!"
"I don't think I'll vote at all and I have lots of friends who feel the same. I don't believe any more that politicians will change the country for the better. Everyone just has to look out for themselves and their own families." "Whatever the elections produce, little will change. Most MPs are there to make money and politics is only of concern to them insofar as they can use their positions to advance their business interests. It is hard to explain to a Westerner the level of cynicism prevalent in parliament. I wouldn't call it a parliament; rather it's Ukraine's most exclusive business club."A sad state of affairs - and probably caused by inside agents causing dissension, which is one of the chief weapons of the Illuminati. How many people know who the "Queen" of the United States of America is? See Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1778, The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997, and identify the stated authority for this order. It is reproduced in full in the Social Security Order shown in the Appendix. So how does a government keep its people from rebelling? Bear in mind the four "Pillars of Control" - Fear, Guilt, Ignorance and Poverty. The Church - see http://nesara.insights2.org/Church.html - is actually the principal Illuminati tool as it covers all four ...... Fear of God (rather than the Love of God); born into sin (Guilt); suppression of knowledge and the promotion of disinformation (Ignorance); tithing and many other demands for monies to support the activities of the church (resulting in Poverty). All the controls on planet Earth originated from a Higher Race ("The Gods") who kept their knowledge to themselves and maintained the human races as their slaves. There were actually five races, distinguished still today by their colour. The 'Illuminati' (those with knowledge) diversified into several fields, each with complete control over the people. Royalty was one branch; the Church was another; and the International Bankers were probably the most active. The latter knew (as Rockefeller once stated publicly) that if you control the purse strings of a nation, it does not matter which politicians or 'parties' are in power. Money was their principal tool, combined with 'interest'. Money itself had no value - banks are the only institutions which do not practise double-entry book-keeping as there is no 'other side' to take into account - money is manufactured from 'thin air' and 95% of it today is 'electronic' - created on a computer. And it is constantly multiplied by interest - quite often compound interest. Canada is the first country to rise up with a Class Action suit against the banks for creating Illegal Money - see http://nesara.insights2.org/IllegalMoney.html. If you do not fully understand the fraud of MONEY and Bank Fraud, please read this (very long) article about the history and role of the Federal Reserve - http://nesara.insights2.org/Fed.html Mind Control
|"20. I have already intimated to you the danger of Parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on Geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, & warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the Spirit of Party, generally. This Spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human Mind. It exists under different shapes in all Governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but in those of the popular form it is seen in its greatest rankness and is truly their worst enemy. The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissention, which in different ages & countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders & miseries, which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security & repose in the absolute power of an Individual: and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of Public Liberty. Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight) the common & continual mischiefs of the spirit of Party are sufficient to make it the interest and the duty of a wise People to discourage and restrain it. It serves always to distract the Public Councils and enfeeble the Public Administration. It agitates the Community with ill-founded Jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot & insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence & corruption, which find a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another. There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the Administration of the Government and serve to keep alive the spirit of Liberty. This within certain limits is probably true--and in Governments of a Monarchical cast Patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favour, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in Governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate & assuage it. A fire not to be quenched; it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest instead of warming it should consume. It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free Country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its Administration, to confine themselves within their respective Constitutional Spheres; avoiding in the exercise of the Powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power; by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, & constituting each the Guardian of the Public Weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient & modern; some of them in our country & under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If in the opinion of the People, the distribution or modification of the Constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly over-balance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield. Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labour to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men & citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man ought to respect & to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private & public felicity. Let it simply be asked where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the Oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure - reason & experience both forbid us to expect that National morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle. 'Tis substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule indeed extends with more or less force to every species of Free Government. Who that is a sincere friend to it, can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric. Promote then as an object of primary importance, Institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened. As a very important source of strength & security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible: avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also that timely disbursements to prepare for danger frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it--avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of Peace to discharge the Debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burthen which we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your Representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should cooperate. To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that towards the payment of debts there must be Revenue--that [p. 22 image] to have Revenue there must be taxes--that no taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient & unpleasant--that the intrinsic embarrassment inseparable from the Selection of the proper objects (which is always a choice of difficulties) ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the Conduct of the Government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining Revenue which the public exigencies may at any time dictate. Observe good faith & justice towards all Nations. Cultivate peace & harmony with all - Religion & morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it? It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great Nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a People always guided by an exalted justice & benevolence. Who can doubt that in the course of time and things the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it? Can it be, that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a Nation with its virtue? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human Nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices? In the execution of such a plan nothing is more essential than that permanent inveterate antipathies against particular Nations and passionate attachments for others should be excluded; and that in place of them just & amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The Nation, which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one Nation against another--disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent collisions, obstinate envenomed and bloody contests. The Nation, prompted by ill will & resentment sometimes impels to War the Government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The Government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times, it makes the animosity of the Nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition and other sinister & pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the Liberty, of Nations has been the victim."|
|"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."|
Thomas Jefferson 1802
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE OF THE 2ND SESSION OF THE 51ST OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:
THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.
THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.
THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state's legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.
51-2-9466 SD 12/31/07|
Also known as the British Admiralty flag - under the laws of the Queen of England
What is commonly referred to as 'The Cabinet' (French for 'small room') is in effect the executive committee of the Canadian government. Its business is the government of Canada, under the leadership of the Prime Minister (who is effectively the 'Chairman of the Board'). The term 'minister' came into being since the English sovereign's ministers 'ministered' the will of the king. That is now obsolete, so perhaps the term 'Secretary' might be found preferable. However, in current usage a Minister of State is a member of the Cabinet, whereas a Secretary of State is not. Deputy Ministers are neither MPs nor Cabinet Ministers but are the senior civil servant in a governmental department and assist the Minister in the administration of the department. The Crown, the Governor General and the Privy Council no longer exist as they represented the King or Queen. Cabinet members were created Privy Councillors on appointment and therefore used the style 'The Right Honourable', which will be used no more. This will be a distinct departure from what has been termed 'Westminster derived' governments as all intrusive controls and outside influences have been removed, allowing the people to govern themselves. As there are no longer any political parties, there is no need for an 'Opposition' (those who for political reasons only oppose the policies and actions of the government), therefore all members of the House of Commons (which may be renamed) work in unison to guide, protect and benefit the people of Canada. Some old traditions will die. There is no need for TWO levels of Government (The Senate and the House of Commons) as this was set up so that the landed gentry could if necessary counter the will of the plebs - the common people. The most appropriate new term might indeed be 'Senate' (Senatus - Latin origin) with its existing members removed, unless invited to play a specific role by the Prime Minister and his cabinet. The 'house of the common people' would therefore be renamed 'The Senate' and its representatives would become 'Senators' - but without the outrageous retirement benefits which the Senate had voted themselves. All Canadians would have the same social benefits. The government should be so designed that particular interests are not represented in multiple aspects of government, such as was revealed in Britain in the 22nd July 2009 issue of the Independent Online:
"Lord Mandelson, who also holds the title of First Secretary of State, has an input on policy on everything from swine flu to the Olympics, climate change to Afghanistan. He is a member of 80 per cent of the 43 Cabinet committees and subcommittees, sitting on more than either the Prime Minister, the Chancellor or the Foreign Secretary."Such a situation puts a figure other than the Prime Minister in the apparently inobtrusive position of running the country. There will be no restrictive impositions on who is appointed to what post - other than being a Canadian citizen. There will no more lobbyists, secret government, political parties nor industrial interests to be appeased. The most suitable person will be appointed, regardless of colour, age, sex, provincial location, or other distinction - which will not of course please all, but there again, it is well accepted that one cannot please everyone. What is best for Canada and Canadians will be the prime concern. The Prime Minister will avail himself of the expertise and experience of his various Ministers and delegate tasks to Ministers in the same way that the Chairman of the Board might appoint a Director to attend to a specific matter and report back to the Board of Directors. They will be his esteemed advisors.
Restrictive Practices: There would no longer be any restrictions on interprovincial trade; no government marketing boards controlling specific products, such as wheat or eggs. Marketing services would be administered by the farmers themselves.
Although there will be no more Stock Exchanges there would still be facilities for the marketing of agricultural products. The demand for meats however will diminish until it disappears completely.
|RETURN to Contents Page|
with Divine Guidance
|© Copyright August 2008 E-mail Contact|